The Schöningen Spears are 8 wooden throwing spears from the Palaeolithic Age, that were found under the management of Dr. Hartmut Thieme from the Lower Saxony State Service for Cultural Heritage (NLD) between 1994 and 1998 in the open-cast lignite mine, Schöningen, county Helmstedt, Germany, together with approx. 16,000 animal bones. More than 300,000 years old,[1][2][3][4] they are the oldest completely preserved hunting weapons in the world and they are regarded as the first evidence of the active hunt by Homo heidelbergensis. These discoveries have permanently changed the picture of the cultural and social development of early man.
Contents |
The site of the finds (Schöningen 13/II sedimentary sequence 4) is one of 13 Palaeolithic places of discovery in the open-cast lignite mine - working area south - that was excavated in the course of the prospection of the quaternary surface layer from 1992 to 2009.
The 60 m x 50 m excavation base that was excluded from coal mining represents a small segment of a former littoral zone that has been visited over millennia between the Elster- and Saale ice age by humans and animals alike. The pedestal displays five massive layered sediment packages that were created by varying levels of the lake and silting up processes.
Thanks to the quick, airtight covering of the archaeological layers by mud, the organic materials are exceptionally well preserved. In the sequence of the sedimentary layers, climate changes can be read with a high resolution - from a warm, dry phase to airy deciduous forests to tundra. The spears themselves are from an approx. 10 metres wide and 50 metres long strip parallel to the former lake shore in the sedimentary layer 4, the late Holstein-interglacial. The archaeological layers beneath have only been partially excavated and have been an objective of a research excavation by the DFG (German Research Association) since 2010.
Together with the spears some stone artefacts, chips as well as over 10.000 animal bones were found, amongst them 90% horse bones, followed by red deer and european bison.[5] The horse bones come from Equus mosbachensis and are indicative of at least 20 individuals. They show numerous cut marks made by stone tools, but only a few bite marks made by animals. The site is interpreted by the excavator Harald Thieme as testimony of a hunting event as well as the following cutting up and preparation of the prey. According to his scenario, the thick reeds at the lake shore gave the hunters cover, from where the horses, trapped between hunters and lake, were culled with accurate spear throws. Because there are bones of young animals amongst the horse bones, he concludes that the hunt took place in autumn.[6] Furthermore he sees evidence of ritualistic activity, because the spears were left behind.[7]
The spears, deformed by the load of the sediment pressure, are made from slim, straight spruce stems – except for spear IV which is made from pine wood. Their dimensions are between 1.8 and 2.5 metres.
They have been worked very thoroughly and are evidence of highly developed technological skills and of workmanlike tradition. Like in today’s tournament javelins, the greatest diameter and therefore its centre of gravity is in the front third of the shaft. The tips are worked symmetrically from the base of the stems, the end of the tips were worked beside the medullary ray, the weakest part of the stem, on purpose.
In their throwing qualities, the wooden Schoeningen spears are equal to today’s tournament javelins. During tests, athletes could throw true to original replicas up to 70 metres.[8][9] The choice of the wood is likely to be climatically determined, because during the cooler climate near the end of the interglacial, conifers grew close to the site of the finds.[10]
More unique wooden artefacts were found at the place of discovery of the wild horse hunting camp: a charred wooden staff (skewer) as well as a wooden tool, tapered at both ends, interpreted as a throwing stick.[11] The stone tools at the place of discovery consist of different scraper-shaped and pointed forms. Evidence of blank production is missing; much retouched debris proves the reworking of the brought-along tools.
Also sensational are the so called grooved wooden tools, excavated at the place of discovery no. 12. Made from the extremely hard wooden branch-bases of the European silver fir and noticably incised at one end, they may have been used as a mounting for stone blades. If this interpretation is correct, they are the oldest composite tools of mankind.[11]
Thanks to the good preservation conditions, at the place of discovery there are many finds of small animals, among them small mammals, fish, molluscs and insects. Together with the carpological remains they make a detailed reconstruction of the climate and the environment of the passing of an interglacial possible.
The spears and the place of discovery Schoeningen have revolutionized the picture of the cultural and social development of early man. So the wide-spread research opinion according to which Homo heidelbergensis and even the much younger Neanderthal were primitive beings without language that lived of plants and carrion could be refuted. Because the spears and their correlation of finds are evidence of highly developed technological skills and are the first obvious proof for an active (big game)hunt. A successful hunt for quickly fleeing gregarious animals without sophisticated hunting strategies, a complex social structure and developed forms of communication (language ability) is unthinkable. The Homo heidelbergensis already had intellectual and cognitive skills like anticipatory planning thinking and acting that so far has only been attributed to modern man.[12][13]
Since 2010, the excavations on top of the excavation base continued in the framework of a project by the Lower Saxony State Service for Cultural Heritage in Hannover and the Eberhard Karls University Tuebingen, Department of Early Prehistory and Quaternary Ecology of the Institute of Pre- and Protohistory and Mediaeval Archaeology, supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Association). Numerous cooperation partners domestic and abroad are involved in the reprocessing and the evaluation of the excavations: Rijksuniversiteit Leiden (Paleontology), Leuphana University Lueneburg(Palynologie) , Senckenberg Research Institute and Nature Museum in Frankfurt a. Main, Leibniz University Hannover(Geology), Institute for Quarternary Lumbers Langnau (wood anatomy), Romano-Germanic Central Museum Mainz and others.
2009 Lower Saxony allocated public funds from the increased funds for the economy package II for the construction of a research and development centre. The centre, close to the place of discovery, will be devoted to the inter-disciplinary research of the Schoeningen places of discovery as well as to the Pleistocene archaeology and present the original finds in an experience-orientated, modern exhibition. The transparent research and laboratory area as well as an interactive visitor’s laboratory link the areas “research” and “museum”. Environmental habitats will visualize in a 24 hectare outdoor area typical plant communities of the interglacial, among them a pasture for wild horses. The place has been planned as an extracurricular place of learning. Building contractor is the town of Schoeningen. Responsible for the conception and contentual planning is the Lower Saxony State Service of Cultural Heritage. The centre will be opened at the beginning of 2013.
Wooden artefacts from the Palaeolithic age are very rarely delivered to posterity. Beside Schoeningen, finds are known from Clacton-on-Sea (England),[14] Torralba (Spain),[15] Ambrona (Spain)[16] and Bad Cannstatt (Germany/Baden-Wuerttemberg),[17] where only the wood interpreted as lance fragment from Clacton-on-Sea is preserved. The artefact character of the calcified lumbers from the place of discovery Bilzingsleben is debatable.[18][19] The wooden stabbing lance from Lehringen, also from Lower Saxony, was found underneath the skeleton of a Straight-tusked Elephant and is aged approximately 125,000 years, so it is much younger. The elephant was possibly killed by it.[20]